Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
The roundworm Caenorhabditis elegans is an effective model system for biological processes such as immunity, behavior, and metabolism. Robotic sample preparation together with automated microscopy and image analysis has recently enabled high-throughput screening experiments using C. elegans. So far, such experiments have been limited to per-image measurements due to the tendency of the worms to cluster, which prevents extracting features from individual animals. We present a novel approach for the extraction of individual C. elegans from clusters of worms in high-throughput microscopy images. The key ideas are the construction of a low-dimensional shape-descriptor space and the definition of a probability measure on it. Promising segmentation results are shown. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2010 | 10.1109/ISBI.2010.5490286 | Rotterdam, Netherlands |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
automated microscopy,robotic sample preparation,biological process,individual animal,image analysis,high-throughput screening experiment,c. elegans,probabilistic shape model,effective model system,high-throughput microscopy image,individual c. elegans,high throughput screening,microscopy,image segmentation,feature extraction,active shape model,biological processes,shape,immune system,bioinformatics,biomedical research,high throughput,probability measure,sample preparation,probability,microorganisms,biochemistry | Computer vision,Active shape model,Pattern recognition,Computer science,Segmentation,Model system,Caenorhabditis elegans,Image segmentation,Feature extraction,Artificial intelligence,Probabilistic logic | Conference |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
2010 | 14-17 April 2010 | 1945-7928 |
ISBN | Citations | PageRank |
978-1-4244-4126-6 | 9 | 1.10 |
References | Authors | |
6 | 7 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Carolina Wählby | 1 | 41 | 6.76 |
Tammy Riklin-Raviv | 2 | 510 | 30.51 |
Vebjorn Ljosa | 3 | 208 | 12.43 |
Annie L. Conery | 4 | 9 | 1.43 |
Polina Golland | 5 | 1690 | 114.38 |
Frederick M. Ausubel | 6 | 9 | 1.77 |
Anne E. Carpenter | 7 | 137 | 12.90 |