Name
Title | ||
|---|---|---|
A numerical study for comparing two response-adaptive designs for continuous treatment effects |
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
We study two sequential, response-adaptive randomized designs for clinical trials; one has been proposed in Bandyopadhyay and Biswas (Biometrika 88: 409-419, 2001) and in Biswas and Basu (Sankhya Ser B 63:27-42, 2001), the other stems from the randomly reinforced urn introduced and studied in Muliere et al. (J Stat Plan Inference 136:1853-1874, 2006a). Both designs can be used in clinical trials where the response from each patient is a continuous variable. Comparison is conducted through numerical studies and along a new guideline for the evaluation of a response-adaptive design. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2007 | 10.1007/s10260-006-0042-4 | STATISTICAL METHODS AND APPLICATIONS |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
response adaptive designs,clinical trials,urn schemes | Econometrics,Inference,Computer science,Clinical trial,Continuous variable,Guideline,Statistics | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
16 | 3 | 1618-2510 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
1 | 0.43 | 0 |
Authors | ||
2 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Maria Paganoni | 1 | 7 | 4.45 |
| Piercesare Secchi | 2 | 70 | 11.12 |