Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
This paper applies symbolic planning to solve parity games equivalent to μ-calculus model checking problems. Compared to explicit algorithms, state sets are compacted during the analysis. Given that
diam(G)\mbox{\it diam}(G) is the diameter of the parity game graph G with node set V, for the alternation-free model checking problem with at most one fixpoint operator, the algorithm computes at most O(diam(G))O(\mbox{\it diam}(G)) partitioned images. For d alternating fixpoint operators,
O(d ·diam(G) ·(\frac|</font
>V|</font
>+(d-</font
>1)d-</font
>1)d-</font
>1)O(d \cdot \mbox{\it diam}(G) \cdot (\frac{|V|+(d-1)}{d-1})^{d-1}) partitioned images are required in the worst case.
Practical models and properties stem from data-flow analysis, with problems transformed to parity game graphs, which are then
compiled to a general game playing planner input.
|
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2008 | 10.1007/978-3-642-00431-5_2 | MoChArt |
DocType | Citations | PageRank |
Conference | 0 | 0.34 |
References | Authors | |
26 | 4 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Marco Bakera | 1 | 38 | 4.64 |
Stefan Edelkamp | 2 | 1557 | 125.46 |
Peter Kissmann | 3 | 181 | 13.93 |
Clemens D. Renner | 4 | 23 | 2.25 |