Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Novel program and read schemes are presented to break barriers in scaling of NAND flash memory such as threshold voltage endurance from floating gate interference, and charge loss tolerance. To enhance threshold voltage endurance and charge loss tolerance, we introduced three schemes; MSB Re-PGM scheme, Moving Read scheme and Adaptive Code Selection scheme. Using the MSB Re-PGM scheme, threshold voltage distribution width is improved about 200 mV. The PGM throughput is enhanced from 1500 μs to 1250 μs. With the Moving Read scheme about half order of UBER is improved with 10 bit ECC. Also, Adaptive Code Selection scheme are used to decrease a current consumption. There is 5.5% current reduction. With these techniques, 32-Gb MLC NAND flash memory has been fabricated using a 32 nm CMOS process technology. Its program throughput reaches 13.0 MB/s at a multi-plane program operation with cache operation keeping a desirable threshold voltage distribution. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2011 | 10.1109/JSSC.2010.2084450 | IEEE Journal of Solid-state Circuits |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
nand circuits,adaptive code selection scheme,msb re-pgm scheme,cell-to-cell interference,moving read scheme,cmos process technology,threshold voltage endurance,endurance enhancing scheme,nand flash memory,msb re-program,cache operation,charge loss tolerance,adaptive code selection,nand flash,moving read,multiplane program operation,cmos logic circuits,size 32 nm,threshold voltage distribution width,floating gate interference,flash memories,couplings,threshold voltage,programming,interference,throughput | Logic gate,Flash memory,Computer science,CPU cache,CMOS,Electronic engineering,Memory management,Non-volatile memory,Electrical engineering,Threshold voltage,Integrated circuit | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
46 | 1 | 0018-9200 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
13 | 3.99 | 3 |
Authors | ||
25 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Changhyuk Lee | 1 | 27 | 7.08 |
Sok-kyu Lee | 2 | 95 | 23.78 |
Sung-Hoon Ahn | 3 | 65 | 15.09 |
Jinhaeng Lee | 4 | 13 | 4.67 |
Wonsun Park | 5 | 13 | 4.33 |
Yongdeok Cho | 6 | 13 | 4.33 |
Chaekyu Jang | 7 | 13 | 4.33 |
Chulwoo Yang | 8 | 13 | 4.67 |
Sang-Hwa Chung | 9 | 234 | 48.13 |
In-Suk Yun | 10 | 13 | 4.33 |
Byoungin Joo | 11 | 13 | 4.33 |
Byoungkwan Jeong | 12 | 13 | 4.33 |
Jeeyul Kim | 13 | 13 | 4.33 |
Jeakwan Kwon | 14 | 13 | 4.33 |
Hyunjong Jin | 15 | 13 | 4.67 |
Yujong Noh | 16 | 18 | 7.93 |
Jooyun Ha | 17 | 13 | 4.33 |
Moonsoo Sung | 18 | 17 | 5.60 |
Daeil Choi | 19 | 13 | 4.33 |
Sang-Hwan Kim | 20 | 42 | 9.21 |
Jeawon Choi | 21 | 13 | 4.33 |
Taeho Jeon | 22 | 13 | 4.33 |
Heejoung Park | 23 | 22 | 6.53 |
Joong-Seob Yang | 24 | 16 | 7.20 |
Yo-Hwan Koh | 25 | 16 | 7.54 |