Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
We present the design and implementation of a new inexact Newton type algorithm for solving large-scale bundle adjustment problems with tens of thousands of images. We explore the use of Conjugate Gradients for calculating the Newton step and its performance as a function of some simple and computationally efficient preconditioners. We show that the common Schur complement trick is not limited to factorization-based methods and that it can be interpreted as a form of preconditioning. Using photos from a street-side dataset and several community photo collections, we generate a variety of bundle adjustment problems and use them to evaluate the performance of six different bundle adjustment algorithms. Our experiments show that truncated Newton methods, when paired with relatively simple preconditioners, offer state of the art performance for large-scale bundle adjustment. The code, test problems and detailed performance data are available at http://grail.cs.washington.edu/projects/bal. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2010 | 10.1007/978-3-642-15552-9_3 | ECCV (2) |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
large-scale bundle adjustment problem,bundle adjustment problem,large-scale bundle adjustment,different bundle adjustment algorithm,art performance,computationally efficient preconditioners,truncated newton method,newton step,newton type algorithm,detailed performance data,bundle adjustment,conjugate gradient,structure from motion,schur complement | Conjugate gradient method,Structure from motion,Mathematical optimization,Bundle adjustment,Computer science,Algorithm,Newton's method in optimization,Artificial intelligence,Factorization,Machine learning,Schur complement,Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm | Conference |
Volume | ISSN | ISBN |
6312 | 0302-9743 | 3-642-15551-0 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
106 | 4.09 | 14 |
Authors | ||
4 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Sameer Agarwal | 1 | 10328 | 478.10 |
Noah Snavely | 2 | 4262 | 197.04 |
Steven M. Seitz | 3 | 8729 | 495.13 |
Richard Szeliski | 4 | 21300 | 2104.74 |