Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
In this paper, a robust Smith prediction filter is proposed for power control design of direct-sequence code-division multiple-access cellular mobile radio systems. Due to the type-I (integrator) structure in the close loop, we first show that zero steady-state tracking error of the averaged received signal-to-noise plus interference ratio (SINR) with respect to a constant target SINR can be ensured. Next, with the Smith predictor to compensate round trip delay, a fixed-order robust H∞ loop filter is developed by using the genetic algorithm to minimize the worst-case variance of the received SINR from the minimax perspective. Using the proposed robust control approach, the statistics of the fading and interference are not needed in the design procedure. To confirm the performance of the proposed method, several simulation results are given in comparison with other methods. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2004 | 10.1109/TWC.2004.834705 | Wireless Communications, IEEE Transactions |
Keywords | DocType | Volume |
design procedure,power control design,interference statistics,robust smith prediction filter,zero steady-state tracking error,time delay compensation,direct sequence code division multiple access,power control,radiofrequency interference,fading statistics,cellular radio,h∞ control,sinr,minimax perspective,robust control,close loop,fixed-order robust h,cellular radio systems,proposed robust control approach,cellular radio system,spread spectrum communication,loop filter,fading,interference ratio,minimax techniques,smith predictor,genetic algorithm,code division multiple access,robust power control,genetic algorithms,$h_infty$ filter,prediction theory,filtering theory,signal-to-noise pulse interference ratio,telecommunication control,ga,round trip delay,fixed-order robust h∞ loop filter,steady state | Journal | 3 |
Issue | ISSN | Citations |
5 | 1536-1276 | 20 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
1.36 | 12 | 3 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Bore-Kuen Lee | 1 | 87 | 11.30 |
Huo-Wen Chen | 2 | 20 | 1.36 |
Bor-Sen Chen | 3 | 2640 | 228.84 |