Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
The Multiple Image Radiography (MIR) method is new imaging modality that extends the capability of conventional absorption based radiography by adding the additional contrast mechanisms of x-ray refraction and ultra-small angle scatter. In order to design a clinically based MIR system, the MIR specific x-ray properties in breast tissue must be analyzed to determine which are diagnostically useful. Developing MIR as an imaging modality also requires developing new phantoms that incorporate x-ray refraction and ultra-small angle scatter in addition to traditional x-ray absorption. Three breast cancer specimens were imaged using MIR to demonstrate its MIR specific x-ray properties. An uncompressed anthropomorphic breast phantom with an imbedded low absorption contrast acrylic sphere was imaged to provide a physical model of how the unique properties of MIR can be utilized to improve upon conventional mammography and illustrate how these can be used to design a clinically useful imaging system. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2006 | 10.1007/11783237_40 | Digital Mammography / IWDM |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
breast tissue,imbedded low absorption contrast,ultra-small angle scatter,multiple image radiography method,conventional absorption,breast cancer specimen,imaging modality,mir system,x-ray refraction,mir specific x-ray property,breast imaging,traditional x-ray absorption,breast cancer,physical model,small angle scattering | Biomedical engineering,Mammography,Breast cancer,Breast cancer specimen,Breast imaging,Imaging phantom,Refraction,Radiography,Radiology,Physics | Conference |
Volume | ISSN | ISBN |
4046 | 0302-9743 | 3-540-35625-8 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
2 | 0.54 | 2 |
Authors | ||
12 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Christopher Parham | 1 | 2 | 0.54 |
Etta Pisano | 2 | 2 | 0.54 |
Chad Livasy | 3 | 2 | 0.54 |
Laura Faulconer | 4 | 2 | 0.54 |
Miles Wernick | 5 | 25 | 1.75 |
Jovan G. Brankov | 6 | 82 | 12.09 |
Miklos Kiss | 7 | 2 | 0.54 |
Dean M. Connor | 8 | 5 | 1.01 |
Jeddy Chen | 9 | 2 | 0.54 |
Ann Wu | 10 | 2 | 0.54 |
Zhong Zhong | 11 | 7 | 2.45 |
Dean Chapman | 12 | 4 | 2.32 |