Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
In this paper, a novel structured noises-reduction technique for OI data is proposed. Canonical correlation analysis (CCA) technique is exploited to separate the underlying independent sources among which the neural response signal is picked out by the correlation analysis. The white noise (WN) criterion is applied to discern the structured components from the unstructured ones. The energy of structured noises is then eliminated from the original data. Monte Carlo simulation is used to test the validity of the procedure. The result shows that after the noise reduction, the true positive rate improves significantly without raising the false positive rate. Five sets of OI data of single trial collected from the HP area of rat's cortex are processed by the procedure and the resulting activation maps present more detailed spatial architecture than those without noise reduction. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2010 | 10.1109/COGINF.2010.5599711 | IEEE ICCI |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
canonical correlation analysis(cca),optical image (oi),monte carlo simulation,neural response signal,intrinsic optical imaging,neurophysiology,biomedical optical imaging,white noise criterion,structured noise analysis,image denoising,noise reduction,monte carlo methods,spatial architecture,brain,white noise,canonical correlation analysis,correlation methods,medical image processing,activation maps,false positive rate,correlation,optical imaging,pixel,signal to noise ratio,principal component analysis | Noise reduction,Computer vision,False positive rate,Monte Carlo method,Pattern recognition,Canonical correlation,Computer science,Signal-to-noise ratio,White noise,Artificial intelligence,Pixel,Principal component analysis | Conference |
Volume | Issue | ISBN |
null | null | 978-1-4244-8041-8 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
0 | 0.34 | 4 |
Authors | ||
6 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Hai-bing Yin | 1 | 90 | 18.64 |
Yadong Liu | 2 | 105 | 14.04 |
Zongtan Zhou | 3 | 412 | 33.89 |
Ming Li | 4 | 13 | 4.67 |
Yucheng Wang | 5 | 11 | 2.23 |
Dewen Hu | 6 | 1290 | 101.20 |