Title | ||
---|---|---|
An Efficient Priority-Based Dynamic Channel Allocation Strategy for Mobile Cellular Networks |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Priority-based dynamic carrier allocation strategies can be classified into three categories: static-priority, dynamic-priority, and hybrid-priority strategies. Strategies based on static priorities do not consider the local carrier reuse conditions, while dynamic-priority strategies do take these conditions into consideration. Intuitively, one would expect dynamic-priority strategies to perform better than static- and hybrid-priority strategies, but in the literature it is the other way around --- existing dynamic-priority strategies are outperformed by some static- and hybrid-priority strategies.In this paper, we propose a dynamic-priority strategy that significantly improves over all existing strategies. Under various traffic conditions, our simulation results indicated that the proposed strategy could reduce call blocking/failure rate by a margin ranging from 15% to 95%. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
1997 | 10.1109/INFCOM.1997.644572 | INFOCOM |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
dynamic-priority strategy,hybrid-priority strategy,priority-based dynamic carrier allocation,simulation result,existing strategy,failure rate,allocation strategy,mobile cellular networks,various traffic condition,static priority,proposed strategy,efficient priority-based dynamic channel,local carrier reuse condition,channel allocation,tdma,computer networks,time division multiple access,dynamic channel allocation,cdma,cellular network,code division multiple access,gsm,frequency allocation,mobile computing,bandwidth,information science | Computer science,Reuse,Computer network,Failure rate,Cellular network,Frequency allocation,Call blocking,Code division multiple access,Time division multiple access,Channel allocation schemes,Distributed computing | Conference |
ISSN | ISBN | Citations |
0743-166X | 0-8186-7780-5 | 21 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
1.66 | 2 | 2 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Xuefeng Dong | 1 | 76 | 7.24 |
Ten H. Lai | 2 | 1336 | 73.26 |