Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Statistical characterization of in-car wireless communication channels has recently gained significance, mainly due to the possibility of deploying a wireless sensor network in the vehicle. In this paper, we report different aspects of a statistical analysis of four representative in- car wireless channels based on the received power data collected from a binary phase shift keying (BPSK) transmission experiment. It is shown that the communication channel between the base station and a sensor placed under the engine compartment is the worst in terms of stability, average fade duration, and fade proportion, while the channel between the base station and a sensor placed in the trunk and the channel between the base station and a sensor placed on the hood are the best. We also show that the 4 representative in-car wireless channels can satisfy the maximum packet delay requirement of less than 500 ms and the trunk channel and the in-the-engine-compartment channels can satisfy the requirement of up to 98% packet reception rate. These statistical characteristics of the in- car wireless channels provide important guidelines for the designer of an in-car sensor system. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2007 | 10.1109/SAHCN.2007.4292822 | SECON |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
packet delay,wireless communication channels,statistical analysis,vehicles,in-the-engine-compartment channels,in-car wireless sensor networks,engines,wireless channels,statistical evaluation,phase shift keying,binary phase shift keying,wireless sensor networks,trunk channel,base station,stability,satisfiability,communication channels,data collection,base stations,wireless sensor network,wireless communication | Base station,Key distribution in wireless sensor networks,Wireless,Computer science,Computer network,Communication channel,Wi-Fi array,Wireless sensor network,Phase-shift keying,Base transceiver station | Conference |
ISBN | Citations | PageRank |
1-4244-1268-4 | 19 | 1.71 |
References | Authors | |
5 | 6 | |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hsin-Mu Tsai | 1 | 305 | 29.74 |
| Wantanee Viriyasitavat | 2 | 260 | 20.07 |
| Ozan K. Tonguz | 3 | 1641 | 119.26 |
| Cem U. Saraydar | 4 | 504 | 54.23 |
| Timothy Talty | 5 | 302 | 35.23 |
| Andrew Macdonald | 6 | 55 | 5.09 |