Paper Info
Title
Towards argument representational tools for hybrid argumentation systems
Abstract
Argumentation Systems are reasoning systems that provide automatic computation of arguments. "Argument Assistant Systems" are graphic-oriented tools for supporting end-users to manipulate arguments. Recently, the novel family of "Hybrid Argumentation Systems" (HAS) has emerged, combining these two approaches. Even when some HAS have been presented, either they show in the interface only final results of the computation of the dispute situation under consideration, or have not explicit considered usability features focused on real final users. Besides, current semantic goes from the definition of theoretical considerations to the graphical representation of the dispute situation under consideration, avoiding the direct manipulation of arguments is a graphical fashion. This paper discusses lessons learned at the development of DeLP Client, a particular HAS software oriented towards end-users where main goals include going beyond the above limitations. To achieve usability goals, some usability-oriented design guidelines recently proposed for the argumentation systems domain are considered.
Year
DOI
Venue
2011
10.1007/978-3-642-21669-5_28
HCI (12)
Keywords
DocType
Volume
graphical representation,hybrid argumentation systems,argument assistant systems,argumentation systems domain,final result,dispute situation,graphical fashion,hybrid argumentation system,explicit considered usability,towards argument representational tool,automatic computation,argumentation systems
Conference
6772
ISSN
Citations 
PageRank 
0302-9743
1
0.36
References 
Authors
19
4
Name
Order
Citations
PageRank
María Paula González1649.25
Sebastian Gottifredi25910.85
Alejandro J. García357628.88
Guillermo Simari41819128.09