Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Algorithms for prediction of RNA secondary structure - the set of base pairs that form when an RNA molecule folds - are valuable to biologists who aim to understand RNA structure and function. Improving the accuracy and efficiency of prediction methods is an ongoing challenge, particularly for pseudoknotted secondary structures, in which base pairs overlap. This challenge is biologically important, since pseudoknotted structures play essential roles in functions of many RNA molecules, such as splicing and ribosomal frameshifting. State-of-the- art methods, which are based on free energy minimization, have high run-time complexity (typically Theta(n(5)) or worse), and can handle (minimize over) only limited types of pseudoknotted structures. We propose a new approach for prediction of pseudoknotted structures, motivated by the hypothesis that RNA structures fold hierarchically, with pseudoknot-free (non-overlapping) base pairs forming first, and pseudoknots forming later so as to minimize energy relative to the folded pseudoknot-free structure. Our HFold algorithm uses two-phase energy minimization to predict hierarchically formed secondary structures in O(n(3)) time, matching the complexity of the best algorithms for pseudoknot-free secondary structure prediction via energy minimization. Our algorithm can handle a wide range of biological structures, including kissing hairpins and nested kissing hairpins, which have previously required Theta(n(6)) time. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2008 | 10.1089/cmb.2007.0198 | JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
computational molecular biology,RNA,secondary structure | RNA,Nucleic acid structure,Rna secondary structure prediction,RNA splicing,Bioinformatics,Translational frameshift,Base pair,Protein secondary structure,Mathematics,Energy minimization | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
15.0 | 2 | 1066-5277 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
3 | 0.39 | 13 |
Authors | ||
3 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hosna Jabbari | 1 | 30 | 3.94 |
| Anne E. Condon | 2 | 1277 | 113.38 |
| Shelly Zhao | 3 | 30 | 1.98 |