Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
We consider an architecture of mediators and wrappers for Internet accessible WebSources of limited query capability. Each call to a source is a WebSource Implementation (WSI) and it is associated with both a capability and (a possibly dynamic) cost. The multiplicity of WSIs with varying costs and capabilities increases the complexity of a traditional optimizer that must assign WSIs for each remote relation in the query while generating an (optimal) plan. We present a two-phase Web Query Optimizer (WQO). In a pre-optimization phase, the WQO selects one or more WSIs for a pre-plan; a pre-plan represents a space of query evaluation plans (plans) based on this choice of WSIs. The WQO uses cost-based heuristics to evaluate the choice of WSI assignment in the pre-plan and to choose a good pre-plan. The WQO uses the pre-plan to drive the extended relational optimizer to obtain the best plan for a pre-plan. A prototype of the WQO has been developed. We compare the effectiveness of the WQO, i.e., its ability to efficiently search a large space of plans and obtain a low cost plan, in comparison to a traditional optimizer. We also validate the cost-based heuristics by experimental evaluation of queries in the noisy Internet environment. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2002 | 10.1145/564691.564702 | SIGMOD Conference |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
low cost plan,good pre-plan,query evaluation plan,wsi assignment,internet accessible websources,best plan,cost-based heuristics,limited query capability,extended relational optimizer,efficient evaluation,traditional optimizer,internet access,query optimization | Web search query,Data mining,Architecture,Computer science,Heuristics,Database,The Internet | Conference |
ISBN | Citations | PageRank |
1-58113-497-5 | 33 | 1.48 |
References | Authors | |
32 | 5 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Vladimir Zadorozhny | 1 | 310 | 45.33 |
Louiqa Raschid | 2 | 1522 | 417.56 |
maria esther vidal | 3 | 787 | 95.93 |
Tolga Urhan | 4 | 371 | 44.86 |
Laura Bright | 5 | 176 | 17.34 |