Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
This article examines whether there are any objections to implementing a mandatory eCall system in the Community and how these could be dealt with. It starts with a short introduction to the motives why the European Commission considers a mandatory in-vehicle eCall. The art. 29 Working Party has issued a working document on eCall identifying several issues regarding personal data protection. The issues in this document will serve as a reference to determine whether there are any objections regarding data protection to implementing a mandatory eCall system. Additionally we will look at a possible eCall implementation in the Community. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2010 | 10.1016/j.clsr.2010.03.009 | Computer Law & Security Review |
Keywords | DocType | Volume |
In-vehicle eCall,Privacy, art. 29 Working Party,Data protection,PETs,2004/52/EC Directive | Journal | 26 |
Issue | ISSN | Citations |
4 | 0267-3649 | 1 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.37 | 1 | 2 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Christophe Geuens | 1 | 52 | 3.92 |
| Jos Dumortier | 2 | 120 | 14.52 |