Title | ||
---|---|---|
New Dynamic Enhancements to the Vertex-Based Rate-Distortion Optimal Shape Coding Framework |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Existing vertex-based operational rate-distortion (ORD) optimal shape coding algorithms use a vertex band around the shape boundary as the source of candidate control points (CP) usually in combination with a tolerance band (TB) and sliding window (SW) arrangement, as their distortion measuring technique. These algorithms however, employ a fixed vertex-band width irrespective of the shape and admissible distortion (AD), so the full bit-rate reduction potential is not fulfilled. Moreover, despite the causal impact of the SW-length upon both the bit-rate and computational-speed, there is no formal mechanism for determining the most suitable SW-length. This paper introduces the concept of a variable width admissible CP band and new adaptive SW-length selection strategy to address these issues. The presented quantitative and qualitative results analysis endorses the superior performance achieved by integrating these enhancements into the existing vertex-based ORD optimal algorithms. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2007 | 10.1109/TCSVT.2007.903788 | IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Techn. |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
width admissible cp band,new dynamic enhancements,admissible distortion,existing vertex-based ord optimal,new adaptive sw-length selection,shape boundary,vertex band,optimal shape,distortion measuring technique,coding framework,vertex-based rate-distortion optimal shape,suitable sw-length,tolerance band,rate distortion optimization,algorithm design and analysis,sliding window,shape,spline | Spline (mathematics),Code rate,Computer science,Control theory,Shape coding,Artificial intelligence,Distortion,Rate–distortion theory,Algorithm design,Sliding window protocol,Pattern recognition,Vertex (geometry),Algorithm | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
17 | 10 | 1051-8215 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
11 | 0.55 | 9 |
Authors | ||
3 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
F. A. Sohel | 1 | 11 | 0.55 |
Laurence Dooley | 2 | 60 | 5.36 |
G. C. Karmakar | 3 | 18 | 2.19 |