Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
We examine the power of silent constant-space probabilistic verifiers that watch asymmetric debates (where one side is unable to see some of the messages of the other) between two deterministic provers, and try to determine who is right. We prove that probabilistic verifiers outperform their deterministic counterparts as asymmetric debate checkers. It is shown that the membership problem for every language in NSPACE(s(n)) has a 2^{s(n)}-time debate where one prover is completely blind to the other one, for polynomially bounded space constructible s(n). When partial information is allowed to be seen by the handicapped prover, the class of languages debatable in 2^{s(n)} time contains TIME(2^{s(n)}), so a probabilistic finite automaton can solve any decision problem in P with small error in polynomial time with the aid of such a debate. We also compare our systems with those with a single prover, and with competing-prover interactive proof systems. |
Year | Venue | Field |
|---|---|---|
2012 | arXiv: Computational Complexity | Discrete mathematics,Decision problem,Computer science,NSPACE,Finite-state machine,Theoretical computer science,Probabilistic logic,Time complexity,Gas meter prover,Completely blind,Bounded function |
DocType | Volume | Citations |
Journal | abs/1209.5192 | 1 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.43 | 8 | 3 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| H. Gökalp Demirci | 1 | 8 | 3.31 |
| A. C. Cem Say | 2 | 193 | 26.13 |
| Abuzer Yakaryilmaz | 3 | 168 | 25.31 |