Title
Adoption of Asynchronous Learning Tools by Traditional Full-Time Students: A Pilot Study
Abstract
Comparing the performance of distance learning and on-campus students is a well-studied problem. Results have shown that distance learners can perform as well or better than on-campus students. Few studies, however, have explored how or why traditional on-campus students utilize the technology intended for distance learners. Many universities and corporations provide educational and training content simultaneously to both face-to-face and distance students. Thus, exploring how instructional technology typically designed for distance learning students could benefit traditional students is important to our understanding of present and future learning environments. To this end, a pilot study was undertaken that explored how graduate students – primarily business majors – adopted and used video-streaming technology for a one semester course on Knowledge Management Tools and Techniques. Results indicated that age, previous use of the technology, need for interaction and Internet connectivity all influenced the decisions of the subjects to adopt the technology. Two-thirds of the subjects used the technology, with a self-reported estimate of procuring 16% of the course content asynchronously. Most used video streaming for convenience reasons and to review class material.
Year
DOI
Venue
2001
10.1023/A:1011446516889
Information Technology and Management
Keywords
Field
DocType
distance learner,instructional technology,used video,video-streaming technology,distance student,pilot study,traditional full-time students,traditional on-campus student,course content asynchronously,semester course,on-campus student,asynchronous learning tools,future learning environment,knowledge management,distance learning
Educational technology,Active learning,Independent study,Computer science,Technology education,Distance education,Asynchronous learning,Synchronous learning,Internet access,Multimedia
Journal
Volume
Issue
ISSN
2
4
1573-7667
Citations 
PageRank 
References 
5
0.92
1
Authors
2
Name
Order
Citations
PageRank
Rick L. Wilson144254.67
Mark Weiser250.92