Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
In a seminal paper Stephenson and Zelen (1989) rethought centrality in networks proposing an information-theoretic distance measure among nodes in a network. The suggested information distance diverges from the classical geodesic metric since it is sensible to all paths (not just to the shortest ones) and it diminishes as soon as there are more routes between a pair of nodes. Interestingly, information distance has a clear interpretation in electrical network theory that was missed by the proposing authors. When a fixed resistor is imagined on each edge of the graph, information distance, known as resistance distance in this context, corresponds to the effective resistance between two nodes when a battery is connected across them. Here, we review resistance distance, showing once again, with a simple proof, that it matches information distance. Hence, we interpret both current-flow closeness and current-flow betweenness centrality in terms of resistance distance. We show that this interpretation has semantic, theoretical, and computational benefits. (c) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2013 | 10.1016/j.socnet.2013.05.003 | Social Networks |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
Information,Resistance distance,Geodesic distance,Closeness centrality,Betweenness centrality | Topology,Electrical network,Random walk closeness centrality,Closeness,Information distance,Centrality,Betweenness centrality,Resistance distance,Mathematics,Geodesic | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
35 | 3 | 0378-8733 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
17 | 0.81 | 10 |
Authors | ||
2 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enrico Bozzo | 1 | 51 | 8.79 |
| Massimo Franceschet | 2 | 658 | 39.91 |