Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
The discipline of First Temple Period epigraphy (the study of writing) relies heavily on manually-drawn facsimiles (black and white images) of ancient inscriptions. This practice may unintentionally mix up documentation and interpretation. The article proposes a new method for evaluating the quality of the facsimile. It is based on a measure, comparing the image of the inscription to the registered facsimile. Some empirical results, supporting the methodology, are presented. The technique is also relevant to quality evaluation of other types of facsimiles and binarization in general. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2012 | 10.1109/DAS.2012.70 | Document Analysis Systems |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
empirical result,quality evaluation,manually-drawn facsimile,hebrew first temple period,white image,new method,registered facsimile,ancient inscription,first temple period epigraphy,ink,text analysis,iron age,indexes,epigraphy | Ostracon,Telecommunications,Document image processing,Computer science,Classics,Hebrew,Real-time computing,Temple,Documentation,Epigraphy,Facsimile | Conference |
ISBN | Citations | PageRank |
978-1-4673-0868-7 | 5 | 0.47 |
References | Authors | |
3 | 3 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Arie Shaus | 1 | 12 | 2.64 |
Eli Turkel | 2 | 84 | 14.00 |
Eli Piasetzky | 3 | 12 | 1.97 |