Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
This paper introduces Input/Output Argumentation Frameworks, a novel approach to characterize the behavior of an argumentation framework as a sort of black box exposing a well-defined external interface. As a starting point, we define the novel notion of semantics decomposability and analyze complete, stable, grounded and preferred semantics in this respect. Then we show as a main result that, under grounded, complete, stable and credulous preferred semantics, Input/Output Argumentation Frameworks with the same behavior can be interchanged without affecting the result of semantics evaluation of other arguments interacting with them. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2012 | 10.3233/978-1-61499-111-3-358 | Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
Argumentation frameworks,Decomposability,Equivalence | Black box (phreaking),Argumentation framework,Programming language,Computer science,Argumentation theory,sort,Input/output,Natural language processing,Artificial intelligence,Semantics | Conference |
Volume | ISSN | Citations |
245 | 0922-6389 | 0 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.34 | 0 | 6 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pietro Baroni | 1 | 722 | 50.00 |
| Guido Boella | 2 | 1867 | 162.59 |
| Federico Cerutti | 3 | 233 | 31.66 |
| Massimiliano Giacomin | 4 | 785 | 54.15 |
| Leendert van der Torre | 5 | 2930 | 224.99 |
| serena villata | 6 | 558 | 70.95 |