Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Problem Frames and i* are two broadly used approaches that require a good background from the requirements engineering. Both approaches have typical traits that fit in equivalent. On the other hand, there are features that do not fit. Thereby, there are some points which need improvements on both of them. This work analyzes the five basic problem frames, defined by Michael Jackson, in the i* context. Our aim is to identify how can they be represented in i* and what gains are achieved if problem frames concept can be applied in i* modeling (like for example simplicity, completeness and flexibility of the built models). |
Year | Venue | Keywords |
|---|---|---|
2006 | WER | requirement engineering |
Field | DocType | Citations |
Engineering drawing,Computer science,Requirements engineering,Theoretical computer science,Completeness (statistics) | Conference | 0 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.34 | 4 | 4 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Lencastre | 1 | 51 | 18.51 |
| Keldjan Alves | 2 | 1 | 0.69 |
| Renata Cristina Faray Melo | 3 | 12 | 2.66 |
| Fernanda M. R. Alencar | 4 | 211 | 37.92 |