Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
There seems to be a need for more rapid, lower cost, exploratory, lightweight, responsive and revisable methods that can help with discovery based research in CSCW. A growing number of researchers are expressing frustration with the challenge of selecting or developing an appropriate research method, applying it in a CSCW context and then having to justify the legitimacy of that method in publications, and particularly through the peer review process. In this workshop we will share experiences in the design adaptation and use of lightweight research methods. We will explore ways to assess the validity, strengths, and weaknesses of these methods - and how to explain these and justify them to others. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2014 | 10.1145/2556420.2558860 | CSCW Companion |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
design adaptation,revisable method,appropriate research method,lightweight method,heavyweight research,cscw context,lightweight research method,lower cost,review process,research methods,agile methods,methodology | Research method,Data science,World Wide Web,Computer-supported cooperative work,Computer science,Knowledge management,Agile software development,Legitimacy,Lightweight methodology,Quick-and-dirty | Conference |
Citations | PageRank | References |
0 | 0.34 | 12 |
Authors | ||
5 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Michael Twidale | 1 | 381 | 41.44 |
Nicholas M. Weber | 2 | 86 | 8.91 |
Alan Chamberlain | 3 | 405 | 48.71 |
Sally Jo Cunningham | 4 | 1086 | 132.93 |
Alan J. Dix | 5 | 1688 | 207.48 |