Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
This paper examines the Intergroup Coordination key process area (KPA) for theoretical significance and measurability. The Software Engineering Institute (SEI) has developed a framework called the Capability Maturity Model (CMM) which enables organizations to measure their “maturity” in doing software engineering. The CMM is not theoretically derived. It is, however, a result of years of anecdotal evidence collected from practitioners. This paper compares the Intergroup Coordination KPA to the body of literature on coordination and measures it using theoretically derived determinants. These determinants are then evaluated for possible relationships to productivity factors that indicate business process support. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2000 | 10.1023/A:1019168807572 | Information Technology and Management |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
capability maturity model,cmm level,productivity factor,intergroup coordination key process,theory-based approach,possible relationship,theoretical significance,business process support,software engineering institute,software engineering,anecdotal evidence,intergroup coordination kpa,business process | Software engineering,Computer science,Anecdotal evidence,Knowledge management,Capability Maturity Model,Business process support,Process area,Process management | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
1 | 3 | 1573-7667 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
1 | 0.35 | 8 |
Authors | ||
4 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kay M. Nelson | 1 | 395 | 37.51 |
| Deb Armstrong | 2 | 4 | 1.77 |
| Mari Buche | 3 | 4 | 1.75 |
| Mehdi Ghods | 4 | 113 | 9.17 |