Title | ||
---|---|---|
Development and Evaluation of Different Methods to Assess Download and Display Time of Image Web Systems. |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Objectives The aim of this study was to develop and verify different methods of measuring time-to-display (TTD) for radiological images
with image web systems (IWS). The process should be automatable in order to repeatedly perform a large number of measurements
without human interaction.
Materials and Methods Three methods were defined and compared with respect to usability, stability, and quality of results. Method 1 was based on
Windows 2000 Performance Monitor, whereas method 2 employed phototransistors taped to the screen and connected to a separate
PC. A software tool developed for method 3, which used Windows application programming interface (API) function, calls to
read the color code assigned to specific pixels on the screen.
Results Method 3 proved to be the most reliable and easy to automate. The accuracy is practically equivalent to method 2, but it proved
to be far more automatable. Method 1 produced the largest mean error, was easily disturbed, but was also easy to set up and
provided additional insights into the system’s architecture especially if combined with method 3.
Conclusions To measure the performance of image distribution systems, any of these methods can be used, but method 3 proved to be superior.
|
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2006 | 10.1007/s10278-006-0856-5 | J. Digital Imaging |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
image compression,mean error,world wide web,picture archiving and communication system,internet,human interaction,quality control,application program interface,distributed system,data compression | Computer vision,Computer science,Usability,Communications system,Color code,Software,Artificial intelligence,Pixel,Web application,Data compression,Image compression | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
19 | 4 | 0897-1889 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
0 | 0.34 | 1 |
Authors | ||
4 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
M. Pietsch | 1 | 0 | 0.34 |
A. Schlaefke | 2 | 0 | 0.34 |
T. J. Vogl | 3 | 0 | 0.34 |
Björn Bergh | 4 | 28 | 9.28 |