Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
The Web is a distributed environment rich with Web services going through continual metamorphosis; thus, sustaining semantic stability of service composition has become a major challenge. Automatic service composition - enabled both by the use of ontologies that describe service domains and by user-specified constraints bound to the ontologies - provides us candidate service pipelines at composition design time. The ontology-based languages for semantically describing web services, such as OWL-S, have been widely used. Though rich and comprehensive in their expressiveness, the use of these languages still leaves much of composition process manual. In this work, we present an ontology-based semantic web service composition system called OntoPipeliner. It employs a novel way of utilizing characteristics of Web services that reflect the classes and properties of domain ontologies and provides the ontology-guided constraints for automatic composition of services, in order to guide the user toward the best pipeline that meets the user requirements. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2011 | 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.01.152 | Expert Syst. Appl. |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
ontology-based semantic web service,web service composition,automatic service composition,web service,service composition,ontology-based automatic semantic service,candidate service pipeline,pipeline generator,composition design time,semantic web service,automatic composition,ontology,automatic pipeline composition,composition system,composition process,service domain,distributed environment,user requirements | World Wide Web,Semantic Web Stack,Computer science,Semantic Web,Data Web,Web modeling,OWL-S,Social Semantic Web,Web service,WS-Policy | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
38 | 8 | Expert Systems With Applications |
Citations | PageRank | References |
1 | 0.35 | 8 |
Authors | ||
7 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sungin Lee | 1 | 21 | 5.17 |
| Senator Jeong | 2 | 22 | 2.83 |
| Hong-Gee Kim | 3 | 104 | 18.80 |
| Hanmin Jung | 4 | 293 | 55.28 |
| Mikyoung Lee | 5 | 55 | 12.56 |
| Seung-Jae Song | 6 | 13 | 1.91 |
| Beom-Jong You | 7 | 27 | 3.20 |