Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
In the graph packing problem we are given several graphs and have to map them into a single host graph G such that each edge of G is used at most once. Much research has been devoted to the packing of trees, especially to the case where the host graph must be planar. More formally, the problem is: Given any two trees T1 and T2 on n vertices, we want a simple planar graph G on n vertices such that the edges of G can be colored with two colors and the subgraph induced by the edges colored i is isomorphic to Ti, for i∈{1,2}. A clear exception that must be made is the star tree which cannot be packed together with any other tree. But a popular hypothesis states that this is the only exception, and all other pairs of trees admit a planar packing. Previous proof attempts lead to very limited results only, which include a tree and a spider tree, a tree and a caterpillar, two trees of diameter four and two isomorphic trees. We make a step forward and prove the hypothesis for any two binary trees. The proof is algorithmic and yields a linear time algorithm to compute a plane packing, that is, a suitable two-edge-colored host graph along with a planar embedding for it. In addition we can also guarantee several nice geometric properties for the embedding: vertices are embedded equidistantly on the x-axis and edges are embedded as semi-circles. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2013 | 10.1007/978-3-642-40104-6_31 | WADS |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
star tree,isomorphic tree,n vertex,binary tree,trees T1,host graph,planar packing,single host graph,spider tree,simple planar graph,graph packing problem | Pseudoforest,Discrete mathematics,Combinatorics,Trémaux tree,Tree (graph theory),Graph embedding,Planar straight-line graph,Multiple edges,Planar graph,Mathematics,Path graph | Conference |
Citations | PageRank | References |
1 | 0.38 | 14 |
Authors | ||
5 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Markus Geyer | 1 | 74 | 7.26 |
Michael Hoffmann | 2 | 227 | 22.74 |
Michael Kaufmann | 3 | 361 | 25.45 |
Vincent Kusters | 4 | 31 | 6.31 |
Csaba D. Tóth | 5 | 573 | 70.13 |