Name
Title | ||
|---|---|---|
Preliminary experiments using subjective logic for the polyrepresentation of information needs. |
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
According to the principle of polyrepresentation, retrieval accuracy may improve through the combination of multiple and diverse information object representations about e.g. the context of the user, the information sought, or the retrieval system [9, 10]. Recently, the principle of polyrepresentation was mathematically expressed using subjective logic [12], where the potential suitability of each representation for improving retrieval performance was formalised through degrees of belief and uncertainty [15]. No experimental evidence or practical application has so far validated this model. We extend the work of Lioma et al. (2010) [15], by providing a practical application and analysis of the model. We show how to map the abstract notions of belief and uncertainty to real-life evidence drawn from a retrieval dataset. We also show how to estimate two different types of polyrepresentation assuming either (a) independence or (b) dependence between the information objects that are combined. We focus on the polyrepresentation of different types of context relating to user information needs (i.e. work task, user background knowledge, ideal answer) and show that the subjective logic model can predict their optimal combination prior and independently to the retrieval process. |
Year | Venue | Keywords |
|---|---|---|
2012 | Proceedings of the 4th Information Interaction in Context Symposium | preliminary experiment,retrieval accuracy,retrieval process,user information need,information object,retrieval performance,different type,retrieval dataset,practical application,diverse information object representation,subjective logic,retrieval system,information need |
Field | DocType | Volume |
Data mining,Subjective logic,Information needs,Information retrieval,Computer science,User information,Information object | Conference | abs/1704.01603 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
4 | 0.45 | 18 |
Authors | ||
3 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Christina Lioma | 1 | 391 | 39.58 |
| Birger Larsen | 2 | 944 | 55.00 |
| PETER INGWERSEN | 3 | 2192 | 291.28 |