Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
It is well-accepted that learnability is an important aspect of usability, yet there is little agreement as to how learnability should be defined, measured, and evaluated. In this paper, we present a survey of the previous definitions, metrics, and evaluation methodologies which have been used for software learnability. Our survey of evaluation methodologies leads us to a new question-suggestion protocol, which, in a user study, was shown to expose a significantly higher number of learnability issues in comparison to a more traditional think-aloud protocol. Based on the issues identified in our study, we present a classification system of learnability issues, and demonstrate how these categories can lead to guidelines for addressing the associated challenges. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2009 | 10.1145/1518701.1518803 | CHI |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
classification system,associated challenge,traditional think-aloud protocol,software learnability,higher number,evaluation methodology,user study,learnability issue,important aspect,new question-suggestion protocol,usability,evaluation,think aloud | Computer science,Usability,Software,Human–computer interaction,Think aloud protocol,Learnability | Conference |
Citations | PageRank | References |
98 | 3.92 | 33 |
Authors | ||
3 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Tovi Grossman | 1 | 2689 | 147.40 |
George W. Fitzmaurice | 2 | 3423 | 512.31 |
Ramtin Attar | 3 | 163 | 8.69 |