Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
A theoretical framework for assessing the attractiveness of websites based on Adaptive Decision Making theory is introduced. The framework was developed into a questionnaire and used to evaluate three websites which shared the same brand and topic but differed in aesthetic design. The DSchool site was favoured overall and was best for aesthetics and usability. The subjective ratings of the sites were in conflict with the subject-reported comments on usability problems. Subjects were given two scenarios for their preference. They changed their preference from the DSchool to the HCI Group's site for the more serious (PhD study) scenario; however, design background students remained loyal to the DSchool. The implications of framing and halo effects on users' judgement of aesthetics are discussed. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2007 | 10.1145/1240624.1240687 | CHI |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
adaptive decision,dschool site,design background student,web user interface,phd study,usability problem,theoretical framework,subject-reported comment,hci group,aesthetic design,halo effect,attractiveness,aesthetics,user interface,usability | Framing (construction),Computer science,Usability,Judgement,Attractiveness,Human–computer interaction,Decision theory,Aesthetic design,User interface,Multimedia | Conference |
Citations | PageRank | References |
56 | 2.66 | 18 |
Authors | ||
3 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Jan Hartmann | 1 | 297 | 12.57 |
Alistair G. Sutcliffe | 2 | 2913 | 256.17 |
Antonella De Angeli | 3 | 925 | 75.05 |