Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
If conditional rewrite-rules are restricted to the form P --> f(x(1),...,x(n)) --> t where P is a finite set of equations, f is any function symbol, x(1),...,x(n) are variables, and t is any term then the premise P contains in general variables which do not occur in the list x(1),...,x(n). The rule with premise P can be applied if P is satisfiable. Therefore, we need methods to solve P and narrowing must be combined with rewriting. But, narrowing becomes a special case, called L-narrowing, closely related to lazy-narrowing. Two lifting lemmas are shown which characterize the relationship of L-narrowing: derivations if the goals are modified by substitutions. From these lifting lemmas, soundness and completeness results can be concluded. |
Year | Venue | Keywords |
---|---|---|
1997 | COMPUTERS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | narrowing,rewriting |
Field | DocType | Volume |
Discrete mathematics,Finite set,Symbol,Premise,Rewriting,Soundness,Completeness (statistics),Mathematics,Lemma (mathematics),Special case | Journal | 16 |
Issue | ISSN | Citations |
3 | 0232-0274 | 0 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.34 | 10 | 1 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Peter Bachmann | 1 | 5 | 3.95 |