Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
The IEEE 802.16e is a compatible and reasonable technology to solve the last mile access problem. Since the multiple services in the system are connection-oriented, it is crucial to provide effective admission control and resource allocation mechanisms to guarantee the quality of service (QoS) of the system. In this paper, we investigate the joint bandwidth reservation and admission control in the IEEE 802.16e networks. Foremost, we consider two system models: model without buffer and model with buffer. Then two optimization problems are formulated for the two models separately. To solve the two min-max optimization problems, we propose a bandwidth reservation algorithm. In addition, the bandwidth reservation thus obtained can be used with admission control jointly. Our aim is to enhance fairness while satisfying QoS requirement. Numerical results are presented to demonstrate the performance of the proposed scheme in terms of maximal call blocking probability and fairness. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2009 | 10.1109/ICC.2009.5199109 | ICC |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
last mile access problem,qos requirement,radio access networks,quality of service,maximal call blocking probability,bandwidth allocation,system model,admission control,metropolitan area networks,ieee 802.16e based network,bandwidth reservation algorithm,broadband networks,optimization problem,minimax techniques,qos,bandwidth reservation,min-max optimization problem,resource allocation mechanism,joint bandwidth reservation,effective admission control,bandwidth,nickel,channel allocation,resource management,system modeling,optimization,satisfiability,ofdm,resource allocation | Admission control,Bandwidth allocation,Computer science,Computer network,Quality of service,Real-time computing,Bandwidth (signal processing),Resource allocation,IEEE 802,Call blocking,Channel allocation schemes | Conference |
ISSN | ISBN | Citations |
1938-1883 E-ISBN : 978-1-4244-3435-0 | 978-1-4244-3435-0 | 1 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.39 | 8 | 4 |