Title
Who needs to do what where?: Using learning management systems on residential vs. commuter campuses
Abstract
Learning Management Systems (LMS) are web-based systems allowing instructors and/or students to share materials and interact online. This study compared differences in LMS use between instructors and students at a large residential campus with students at a smaller commuter campus. Responses to an online survey about LMS activities and tools were categorized by three different interaction types: Learner-Instructor (LI), Learner-Content (LC), and Learner-Learner (LL). Aggregated log data was also analyzed to see if students' use was consistent with their beliefs. Respondents from both campuses rate highly all activities and tools within the LMS. Findings suggest that residential students value activities and tools supporting LC interaction more than commuter students, while commuter students value activities and tools fostering LL interactions more than residential students. The aggregated log data was consistent with the survey data showing a higher level of activity in the most heavily used LC-oriented tools for the residential campus and higher activity in the LL-oriented tools for the commuter campus.
Year
DOI
Venue
2011
10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.006
Computers & Education
Keywords
Field
DocType
commuter students value activity,interactive learning environments,management system,lms activity,improving classroom teaching,teaching/learning strategies,aggregated log data,lms use,commuter campus,post-secondary education,residential student,large residential campus,distributed learning environments,residential students value activity,commuter student,residential campus,computer mediated communication,survey data,comparative analysis,internet,interaction,educational technology
Educational technology,Survey data collection,World Wide Web,Learning Management,Computer science,Computer-mediated communication,Pedagogy,The Internet
Journal
Volume
Issue
ISSN
56
3
Computers & Education
Citations 
PageRank 
References 
12
1.23
7
Authors
3
Name
Order
Citations
PageRank
Steven Lonn118316.87
Stephanie D. Teasley232828.94
Andrew E. Krumm3344.96