Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Freely available experimental transformation languages have begun to stimulate practical usage of textual transformation notations. The forthcoming QVT transformation languages may provide standardisation or at least interchange capabilities for these experimental languages. Graphical transformation notations are proving rather less successful. We identify many disadvantages of the graphical approach, consider how they can be circumvented and describe changes in the UMLX notation and tool support to improve usability and QVT compatibility. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2008 | 10.1016/j.entcs.2008.04.039 | Electr. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
forthcoming qvt transformation language,textual transformation notation,umlx notation,interchange capability,umlx approach,graphical transformation notation,graphical approach,experimental language,model transformation,transformation editor,qvt compatibility,practical usage,available experimental transformation language,standardisation | Notation,Model transformation,Programming language,Computer science,Usability,Theoretical computer science,Artificial intelligence,Natural language processing | Journal |
Volume | ISSN | Citations |
211, | Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science | 4 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.53 | 2 | 1 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Edward D. Willink | 1 | 31 | 9.26 |