Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Purpose - This paper aims to examine the effectiveness of computer usage policies in university settings.Design/methodology/approach - Students enrolled in business courses at three midwestern universities were divided, by class, into control and experimental groups. All subjects were asked to complete a survey regarding their awareness of university computer usage policies, consequences of misuse, and methods of policy distribution. The experimental group was exposed to sample computer usage policies. Two weeks later, all subjects were asked to complete the same survey again.Findings - Results suggest that most students have not read their university computer usage policies. However, the presence of a computer usage policy does influence students who have read those policies, but a single exposure is insufficient to influence all subjects.Research limitations/implications - The sample is limited to students from three universities.Practical implications - Written policy statements alone cannot serve as a cornerstone of security; multiple factors must be used to communicate the content of the deterrents.Originality/value - This study notes that the existence of computer usage policies within a university (or organization) does not ensure that all users are familiar with the content of those policies and the penalties imposed for their violation. Providing a copy of computer usage policies to students (or employees) and verbally highlighting major points are not sufficient exposure to eliminate indifference about computer misuse. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2005 | 10.1108/02635570510583280 | INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
computer crime, information systems, educational policy | Information system,Computer science,Computer usage,Management science,Marketing | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
105 | 1-2 | 0263-5577 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
10 | 0.70 | 10 |
Authors | ||
3 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Charles B. Foltz | 1 | 10 | 0.70 |
| Timothy Paul Cronan | 2 | 333 | 26.61 |
| Thomas W. Jones | 3 | 155 | 12.31 |