Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
In this paper, we present a comprehensive analysis of the performance of a wireless sensor network based target tracking system using the particle filter. In particular, we evaluate the effect of various network design parameters such as the number of nodes, number of generated particles, and sampling interval on the tracking accuracy and computation time of the tracking system. Based on our analysis, we also present recommendations on suitable values for the relevant network design parameters, which provide a reasonable tradeoff between accuracy and computational expense for this problem. In addition, we also analyse the theoretical Cramer-Rao bound as the benchmark for the best possible tracking performance. We demonstrate that the results from our simulations closely match the theoretical bounds. We also present initial results from experiments comprising of a 25 node wireless sensor network. Initial experimental results are promising and show that the PF based estimation is suitable for detection and tracking using inexpensive wireless sensor network devices. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2008 | 10.1109/MAHSS.2008.4660057 | Atlanta, GA |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
particle filtering (numerical methods),target tracking,wireless sensor networks,network design parameters,particle filter,performance evaluation,target tracking system,theoretical Cramer-Rao bound,wireless sensor network | Base station,Telecommunications,Network planning and design,Sampling interval,Computer science,Particle filter,Tracking system,Real-time computing,Wireless sensor network,Calibration,Computation,Distributed computing | Conference |
ISSN | ISBN | Citations |
2155-6806 | 978-1-4244-2575-4 | 7 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.61 | 6 | 7 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Nadeem Ahmed | 1 | 367 | 23.79 |
Yifei Dong | 2 | 200 | 17.58 |
Salil S. Kanhere | 3 | 2405 | 173.60 |
Sanjay Jha | 4 | 1745 | 157.12 |
mark g rutten | 5 | 102 | 8.19 |
travis bessell | 6 | 16 | 1.63 |
Neil J. Gordon | 7 | 175 | 13.61 |