Title | ||
---|---|---|
System analysis and energy model for radio-triggered battery-less monolithic wireless sensor receiver |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Monolithic wireless sensors with integrated antenna, on-chip transceiving, sensing and energy scavenging are low-cost and robust, thus very suitable for mass production and deployment. The design of such a sensor node requires a proper architecture with careful trade-offs and joint considerations over different building blocks. In this paper, we focus on the energy scavenging and receiver part of such a sensor node. A radio-triggered receiver architecture is proposed to achieve the extreme low energy budget. Energy/power models for different building blocks are developed that show the tradeoffs between available energy and sensor performance. A system-level analysis identifies the 60GHz mm-wave band is suitable for such applications. Moreover, a design example of receiver front-end in 65nm CMOS technology is presented to demonstrate the potential performance of the proposed architecture. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2013 | 10.1109/ISCAS.2013.6572160 | ISCAS |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
cmos integrated circuits,mimic,energy scavenging,size 65 nm,integrated antenna,system level analysis,mass production,on-chip transceiver,cmos technology,energy harvesting,radio transceivers,frequency 60 ghz,radio triggered batteryless monolithic wireless sensor receiver,millimetre wave antennas,sensor deployment,wireless sensor networks,sensor placement,receiver front end,wireless communication,radio frequency,antennas | Sensor node,Key distribution in wireless sensor networks,Radio receiver design,Wireless,Computer science,Energy harvesting,Electronic engineering,Mobile wireless sensor network,Available energy,Wireless sensor network | Conference |
ISSN | ISBN | Citations |
0271-4302 | 978-1-4673-5760-9 | 1 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.43 | 4 | 6 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Hao Gao | 1 | 17 | 8.67 |
Yan Wu | 2 | 43 | 6.99 |
Marion Matters-Kammerer | 3 | 7 | 4.93 |
Jean-paul M. G. Linnartz | 4 | 234 | 38.83 |
Arthur H. M. van Roermund | 5 | 379 | 67.62 |
Peter G. M. Baltus | 6 | 74 | 20.38 |