Title
Applying Multiple Methods to Assess the Readability of a Large Corpus of Medical Documents.
Abstract
Medical documents provided to patients at the end of an episode of care, such as discharge summaries and referral letters, serve as an important vehicle to convey critical information to patients and families. Increasingly, healthcare institutions are also experimenting with granting patients direct electronic access to other types of clinical narratives that are not typically shared unless explicitly requested, such as progress notes. While these efforts have great potential to improve information transparency, their value can be severely diminished if patients are unable to read and thus unable to properly interpret the medical documents shared to them. In this study, we approached the problem by contrasting the 'readability' of two types of medical documents: referral letters vs. other genres of narrative clinician notes not explicitly intended for direct viewing by patients. To establish a baseline for comparison, we also computed readability scores of MedlinePlus articles-exemplars of fine patient education materials carefully crafted for lay audiences. We quantified document readability using four different measures. Differences in the results obtained through these measures are also discussed.
Year
DOI
Venue
2013
10.3233/978-1-61499-289-9-647
Studies in Health Technology and Informatics
Keywords
Field
DocType
Readability,Referral letters,Electronic health records,Natural language processing,MedlinePlus
Medical education,Health care,MedlinePlus,World Wide Web,Knowledge management,Readability,Documentation,Patient education,MEDLINE,Medicine,Comprehension,Referral
Conference
Volume
Issue
ISSN
192
1-2
0926-9630
Citations 
PageRank 
References 
5
0.56
1
Authors
9
Name
Order
Citations
PageRank
Danny T. Y. Wu1134.19
David A Hanauer219518.96
Qiaozhu Mei34395207.09
Patricia M. Clark481.01
Lawrence C. An5111.88
Jianbo Lei610413.03
Joshua Proulx7234.34
Qing Zeng-Treitler818423.10
Kai Zheng916421.96