Title | ||
---|---|---|
On the Performance of Iterative Demapping and Decoding Techniques over Quasi-Static Fading Channels |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
In this paper, we investigate in detail the performance of iterative demapping and decoding techniques over quasi-static fading channels both with and without antenna diversity. In particular, we consider the effect on the system performance of various mapping schemes, different coding schemes, the inter- leaver size as well as space diversity. Results demonstrate that over quasi-static fading channels characterized by significant antenna diversity, mappings traditionally optimized for iterative receivers (e.g., Boronka mapping) outperform mappings more appropriate for non-iterative receivers (e.g., Gray mapping). In contrast, over quasi-static fading channels characterized by limited antenna diversity, Gray mapping always outperform Boronka mapping for all Eb/N0 and all iterations. Strikingly, this situation is in sharp contrast to that in the AWGN case. We note that we can further improve the performance of non-iterative systems (e.g., Gray mapping) having limited antenna diversity by increasing the memory size and removing the interleaving. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2007 | 10.1109/PIMRC.2007.4394441 | Athens |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
channel coding,fading channels,interleaved codes,iterative decoding,decoding technique,interleaver size,iterative demapping,quasistatic fading channel,space diversity | Antenna diversity,Diversity scheme,Telecommunications,Fading,Computer science,Communication channel,Algorithm,Real-time computing,Coding (social sciences),Decoding methods,Additive white Gaussian noise,Interleaving | Conference |
ISBN | Citations | PageRank |
978-1-4244-1144-3 | 1 | 0.36 |
References | Authors | |
11 | 5 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
William R. Carson | 1 | 53 | 3.34 |
Ioannis Chatzigeorgiou | 2 | 104 | 12.74 |
Ian J. Wassell | 3 | 288 | 35.10 |
Miguel R. D. Rodrigues | 4 | 1500 | 111.23 |
Rolando A. Carrasco | 5 | 73 | 16.37 |