Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Formal specification languages provide assistance to solving the problem of high maintenance costs caused by ineffective communication of a system's requirements. Using a sound mathematical basis, a formal specification language provides a precise and definitive system description that can serve as a binding contract. Additionally, the integration of the object-oriented paradigm with a formal specification language provides increased potential for software reuse, conceptually cleaner specifications and a framework for defining interfaces. To this end, there has been significant work done to extend existing specification languages to allow object-oriented specifications.This paper provides a comparison of such object-oriented specification languages, specifically, those extending Z. The paper is organized into five major sections. After a brief introduction to the concepts of formal specification languages and Z, a simple library system is defined and used as an example throughout the paper. Each of the object-oriented specification languages is introduced and classified as either using Z in an object-oriented style or providing a true object-oriented extension of Z. For each language, the specification of the example library system is presented following a brief overview of the language's features. An in-depth comparison is made of each of the languages which provide a true object-oriented extension of Z. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
1996 | 10.1142/S0218194096000211 | INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
formal specification, object-oriented Z, object-Z, Z++, MooZ, OOZE, ZEST, Schuman and Pitt | Specification language,Z notation,Programming language specification,Programming language,Software engineering,Computer science,Object language,Formal specification,Language Of Temporal Ordering Specification,Formal methods,Object-Z | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
6 | 3 | 0218-1940 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
0 | 0.34 | 0 |
Authors | ||
2 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
B. L. Achee | 1 | 15 | 1.53 |
Doris L. Carver | 2 | 232 | 34.66 |