Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
The collision of interests between a person's right to be secure from unreasonable searches and seizures and a government'sobligation to protect its borders has recently become ripe for court decisions. Although some might question how laptops could form thebattleground for such an important discussion, several cases indicate that this debate has already started in earnest the US and Canada. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2007 | 10.1109/MSP.2007.40 | IEEE Security & Privacy |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
important discussion,reconciling laptop searches,unreasonable search,setting boundaries,court decision,search and seizure,privacy,ubiquitous computing,data privacy,private information,internet,information privacy | Internet privacy,Laptop,Computer science,Computer security,Nexus (standard),Ubiquitous computing,Information privacy,Private information retrieval,Government,Search and seizure,The Internet | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
5 | 2 | 1540-7993 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
2 | 0.40 | 1 |
Authors | ||
3 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| E. Michael Power | 1 | 15 | 2.72 |
| Jonathan Gilhen | 2 | 2 | 0.40 |
| Roland L. Trope | 3 | 13 | 3.89 |