Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Efficient testing of the collaborative and real-time aspects of collaborative real-time editing tools (CRETs) is extremely challenging. Changes in testing parameters and conflict resolution policies result in significant time and effort for modifying the corresponding test cases. In this paper, we propose a time-line diagram approach to visually model aspects of timing and collaborative conflicts useful for efficient generation of test cases. A specification language, ACDATE, is introduced to formally specify the corresponding test scenarios. We develop an algorithm that allows configuring test parameters and collaboration policies on the fly, automatically generates textual test cases corresponding to the timeline diagram, and creates corresponding test scripts in the ACDATE language. A prototype implementation shows good results, with automatically generated test cases consistent across from a visual and textual perspective. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2007 | 10.1109/COMPSAC.2007.208 | COMPSAC (1) |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
efficient generation,test case,acdate language,conflict resolution policy,test case generation,collaborative conflict,conflict resolution policies result,test parameter,text editing,corresponding test case,corresponding test script,internet,time-line diagram,acdate specification language,test scenario,groupware,collaborative real-time editing tools,corresponding test scenario,formal specification,textual test case,timing conflict,conflict resolution,collaborative software,writing,software testing,real time,collaboration,concurrent computing,specification language | Specification language,Test Management Approach,Systems engineering,Software engineering,Computer science,Collaborative software,Test script,Timeline,Formal specification,Scenario testing,Test case | Conference |
Volume | ISSN | ISBN |
1 | 0730-3157 | 0-7695-2870-8 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
1 | 0.37 | 6 |
Authors | ||
5 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lian Yu | 1 | 235 | 26.56 |
| Wenping Xiao | 2 | 1 | 0.71 |
| Changyan Chi | 3 | 57 | 5.70 |
| Lin Ma | 4 | 1 | 0.37 |
| Hui Su | 5 | 293 | 33.30 |