Title
Can legal knowledge be derived from legal texts?
Abstract
Knowledge acquisition is undoubtedly one of the major bottle-necks in the development of legal expert systems. Usually the knowledge is collected by knowledge engineers who are forced to make their own interpretations of the knowledge in order to map it on a knowledge representation technique, thus resulting into erroneous and legally unacceptable interpretations of the law. The aim of NOMOS (an EC supported project under the ESPRIT II initiative) was to assist the knowledge engineer by providng tools that perform semi-automatic knowledge acquisition from legal texts in Italian and French. This paper reports on the results of the first evaluation of the knowledge collected by these tools. The evaluation was performed by complementing the tools with a fully functional expert system that accepted the generated knowledge bases and allowed experts to test the completeness of the knowledge through a series of interactive consultations. The knowledge base used for this evaluation was derived from the text for the Italian Value Added Tax Law. The text was pre-processed in its ASCII form by the Nomos tools and the generated knowledge base was filtered through to a conventional expert system shell to generate the evaluation expert system.Knowledge extracted directly from text was converted into a hybrid of production rules and Conceptual Graphs. [see SOWA 1984] Knowledge collected from other sources, such as previously resolved cases, explanations of terms and examples, were linked to the knowledge base using an automated hypertext technique. [see KONSTANTINOU & MORSE 1992] Finally, the expert system was tested using real-life cases supplied by the Italian ministry of finance.
Year
DOI
Venue
1993
10.1145/158976.159004
ICAIL
Keywords
Field
DocType
expert system,conventional expert system shell,legal expert system,knowledge base,legal text,semi-automatic knowledge acquisition,evaluation expert system,functional expert system,knowledge acquisition,knowledge engineer,legal knowledge,knowledge representation technique,conceptual graph,nonmonotonic reasoning,knowledge representation,knowledge engineering,knowledge extraction,legal system,arguments
Procedural knowledge,Data mining,Domain knowledge,Computer science,Knowledge management,Knowledge-based systems,Knowledge engineering,Knowledge base,Knowledge acquisition,Legal expert system,Open Knowledge Base Connectivity
Conference
ISBN
Citations 
PageRank 
0-89791-606-9
7
0.57
References 
Authors
8
3
Name
Order
Citations
PageRank
Vassilis Konstantinou192.33
John Sykes270.57
Georgios N. Yannopoulos370.57