Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
SIMD arrays are likely to become increasingly important as coprocessors in domain specific systems as architects continue to leverage RAM technology in their design. The problem this work addresses is the evaluation of SIMD arrays with respect to complex applications whilweb accounting for operating frequency and chip area. The method we use is to bridge the gap between architecture-level and EDA-level modeling by using an EDA-based tool to calibrate architectural simulations. The resulting system retains much of the high throughput of the architecture-level simulator but also has accuracy similar to that of an early pass EDA synthesis and circuit simulation. We have used our system to evaluate hundreds of potential SIMD array designs with respect to real applications. Some of the results were surprising: the slowdown caused by underutilized resources was significantly more than we had anticipated. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2000 | 10.1006/jpdc.1999.1602 | J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
simd array designs,simd architecture,domain specific system,eda synthesis,domain speciflc systems,virtual prototyping,parallel computer architecture,architectural simulation,computer simu- lation,ram technology,potential simd array design,eda-based tool,computer simulation,eda-level modeling,resulting system,domain specific systems,simd array design,simd array,computer design evaluation,architecture-level simulator,space technology,concurrent computing,frequency,application software,high level synthesis,chip,high throughput,coprocessors,throughput | Computer architecture,Space technology,Read-write memory,Computer science,High-level synthesis,SIMD,Chip,Concurrent computing,Coprocessor,Application software | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
60 | 2 | Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing |
ISBN | Citations | PageRank |
0-7695-0087-0 | 7 | 0.64 |
References | Authors | |
17 | 5 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Martin C Herbordt | 1 | 507 | 57.27 |
Jade Cravy | 2 | 8 | 1.34 |
Renoy Sam | 3 | 7 | 0.64 |
Owais Kidwai | 4 | 7 | 0.97 |
Calvin Lin | 5 | 7 | 0.64 |