Title | ||
---|---|---|
New Validation Method for Establishing Correspondence Between Pairs of X-Ray Mammograms |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Establishing spatial correspondence between features visible in x-ray mammograms obtained at different times has great potential to aid assessment of change in the breast indicative of malignant changes and facilitate their quantification. The literature contains numerous non-rigid registration algorithms developed for this purpose, but quantitative estimation of registration accuracy is limited. In this paper we describe a novel validation method which simulates plausible mammographic compressions of the breast using an MRI derived finite element model. By projecting the resulting known 3D displacements into 2D and simulating x-ray mammograms from these same compressed MR volumes, we can generate convincing images with known 2D displacements with which to validate a registration algorithm. We illustrate this approach by computing the accuracy for a non-rigid registration algorithm applied to mammographic test images generated from three patient MR datasets. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2006 | 10.1109/CVPRW.2006.143 | CVPRW '06 Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
mr volume,new validation method,registration algorithm,numerous non-rigid registration,x-ray mammograms,simulating x-ray mammograms,patient mr datasets,non-rigid registration algorithm,convincing image,plausible mammographic compression,registration accuracy,finite element model,magnetic resonance imaging,breast cancer,computer vision,testing,finite element methods | Computer vision,Image generation,Pattern recognition,Computer science,Image coding,Finite element method,Artificial intelligence | Conference |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
2006 | 1 | 2160-7508 |
ISBN | Citations | PageRank |
0-7695-2646-2 | 0 | 0.34 |
References | Authors | |
13 | 4 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
John H. Hipwell | 1 | 243 | 32.58 |
Christine Tanner | 2 | 17 | 1.97 |
William R Crum | 3 | 448 | 32.49 |
David J. Hawkes | 4 | 4262 | 470.26 |