Title | ||
---|---|---|
Demaq/Transscale: Automated distribution and scalability for declarative applications |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
The goal of the Demaq/TransScale system is to automate the distribution of applications to multiple hosts. Today, in order to create highly scalable architectures, developers have to manually restructure the application logic, creating balanced application fragments and data partitions to distribute across the available host machines. Our approach automates much of this manual work. We show how a novel, messaging-based programming model allows to implement distribution as a source-level transformation that turns a non-distributed application specification into a set of programs that can be executed on the various machines of a cluster. The challenge is the identification of application fragments that can be executed independently of each other, such that each fragment can be executed using only local transactions. Further, our method allows developers to increase scalability (i.e. the number of possible fragments) by choosing from a library of automatically applicable rewrites. As a running example, and for the reported experimental results, we use TPC-App as a benchmark application. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2011 | 10.1016/j.is.2010.07.007 | Inf. Syst. |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
benchmark application,application logic,scalability,processes,non-distributed application specification,cloud computing,application fragment,queues,declarative application,message processing,balanced application fragment,transscale system,automated distribution,distribution,applicable rewrite,xml,available host machine,data partition,distributed application,programming model | Data mining,Programming language,XML,Programming paradigm,Message processing,Computer science,Queue,Application logic,Database,Distributed computing,Scalability,Cloud computing | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
36 | 3 | Information Systems |
Citations | PageRank | References |
5 | 0.39 | 22 |
Authors | ||
2 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Alexander Böhm | 1 | 45 | 6.75 |
Carl-christian Kanne | 2 | 644 | 53.20 |