Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
An important aspect of decision making is that a decision is not made at a time assuming that the decision maker (DM) has all relevant information at hand at the same time. On the contrary making a decision results from a process during which (non) relevant and possibly conflicting information come at different instant. Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) is a typical case of a dynamic process. We show in this paper how argumentation can help to represent this dynamics. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2013 | 10.1007/978-3-642-39091-3_30 | ECSQARU |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
conflicting information,dynamic multiple criteria decision,typical case,multi-criteria decision,dynamic process,relevant information,decision result,decision making,important aspect,different instant,decision maker | Decision analysis,Decision rule,Computer science,Weighted sum model,Influence diagram,Decision field theory,R-CAST,Evidential reasoning approach,Decision engineering,Management science | Conference |
Citations | PageRank | References |
0 | 0.34 | 8 |
Authors | ||
1 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Christophe Labreuche | 1 | 709 | 65.78 |