Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
We investigate the research programme of dynamic doxastic logic (DDL) and analyze its underlying methodology. The Ramsey test
for conditionals is used to characterize the logical and philosophical differences between two paradigmatic systems, AGM and
KGM, which we develop and compare axiomatically and semantically. The importance of Grdenfors’s impossibility result on the
Ramsey test is highlighted by a comparison with Arrow’s impossibility result on social choice. We end with an outlook on the
prospects and the future of DDL. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2007 | 10.1007/s11229-006-9143-8 | Synthese |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
Dynamic doxastic logic,Theory change,Belief revision,Belief update,Ramsey test,Arrow’s theorem | Social choice theory,Logical conjunction,Arrow,Computer science,Impossibility,Philosophy of language,Epistemology,Ramsey RESET test,Belief revision,Doxastic logic | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
155 | 2 | 0039-7857 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
13 | 1.02 | 13 |
Authors | ||
2 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Hannes Leitgeb | 1 | 115 | 19.26 |
Krister Segerberg | 2 | 577 | 245.32 |