Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Recently, a temporal extension of the argumentation defeasible reasoning system $\mbox{\textsf{DeLP}}$ has been proposed. This system, called $\mbox{\textsf{t-DeLP}}$, allows to reason defeasibly about changes and persistence over time but does not offer the possibility of ranking defeasible rules according to criteria of preference or certainty (in the sense of belief). In this contribution we extend $\mbox{\textsf{t-DeLP}}$ by allowing to attach uncertainty weights to defeasible temporal rules and hence stratifying the set of defeasible rules in a program. Technically speaking, weights are modelled as necessity degrees within the frame of possibility theory, a qualitative model of uncertainty. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2012 | 10.1007/978-3-642-33353-8_19 | JELIA |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
temporal rule,reason defeasibly,defeasible rule,possibility theory,necessity degree,uncertainty weight,temporal defeasible argumentation framework,ranking defeasible rule,temporal extension,possibilistic weight,qualitative model,argumentation defeasible reasoning system | Argumentation framework,Ranking,Computer science,Argumentation theory,Possibility theory,Theoretical computer science,Defeasible reasoning,Artificial intelligence,Logic programming,Conservative extension,Defeasible estate | Conference |
Citations | PageRank | References |
5 | 0.45 | 18 |
Authors | ||
3 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lluís Godo | 1 | 888 | 56.28 |
| Enrico Marchioni | 2 | 114 | 12.96 |
| Pere Pardo | 3 | 47 | 8.63 |