Name
Title | ||
|---|---|---|
Multidisciplinary design optimisation of a recurve bow based on applications of the autogenetic design theory and distributed computing |
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
The focus of this paper is to present a method of multidisciplinary design optimisation based on the autogenetic design theory ADT that provides methods, which are partially implemented in the optimisation software described here. The main thesis of the ADT is that biological evolution and the process of developing products are mainly similar, i.e. procedures from biological evolution can be transferred into product development. In order to fulfil requirements and boundary conditions of any kind that may change at any time, both biological evolution and product development look for appropriate solution possibilities in a certain area, and try to optimise those that are actually promising by varying parameters and combinations of these solutions. As the time necessary for multidisciplinary design optimisations is a critical aspect in product development, ways to distribute the optimisation process with the effective use of unused calculating capacity, can reduce the optimisation time drastically. Finally, a practical example shows how ADT methods and distributed optimising are applied to improve a product. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2012 | 10.1080/17517575.2011.650216 | Enterprise IS |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
optimisation time,optimisation software,multidisciplinary design optimisation,recurve bow,adt method,optimisation process,autogenetic design theory adt,biological evolution,product development look,product development,multidisciplinary design optimisations,process automation,genetic algorithms,boundary condition,genetic algorithm,distributed computing,design theory | Biological evolution,Process automation system,Multidisciplinary approach,Systems engineering,Computer science,Software,Designtheory,Genetic algorithm,New product development | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
6 | 3 | 1751-7575 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
17 | 0.66 | 4 |
Authors | ||
4 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Matthias Fritzsche | 1 | 17 | 0.66 |
| Konstantin Kittel | 2 | 17 | 1.00 |
| Alexander Blankenburg | 3 | 17 | 0.66 |
| S. Vajna | 4 | 17 | 1.34 |