Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
The efficiency of the current centralized air-traffic management is limited. A next-generation air transportation system should allow airplanes (manned and unmanned) to change their flight paths during the flight without approval from a centralized en route control. Such a scheme requires decentralized peer-to-peer conflict detection and collision-avoidance processes. In this paper, two cooperative (negotiation-based) conflict-resolution algorithms are presented: iterative peer-to-peer and multiparty algorithms. They are based on high-level flight-plan variations using evasion maneuvers. The algorithms work with a different level of coordination autonomy, respect realistic assumptions of imprecise flight execution (integrating required navigation performance), and work in real time, where the planning and plan-execution phases interleave. Both algorithms provide a resolution in a 4-D domain (3-D space and time). The proposed algorithms are evaluated experimentally, and their quality is studied in comparison with a state-of-the-art agent-based method-the satisficing game theory algorithm. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2011 | 10.1109/TITS.2010.2057246 | IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
4-d domain,peer-to-peer conflict detection,collision-avoidance process,imprecise flight execution,algorithms work,agent-based cooperative decentralized airplane-collision,flight path,iterative peer-to-peer,real time,3-d space,current centralized air-traffic management,iterative methods,government,control system,conflict resolution,control systems,cooperation,game theory,air traffic control,intelligent agents,optimization,algorithms,air transport,iterative algorithm,air transportation,change detection | Satisficing,Intelligent agent,Collision detection,Iterative method,Air traffic control,Simulation,Required navigation performance,Game theory,Engineering,Control system | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
12 | 1 | 1524-9050 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
6 | 0.57 | 8 |
Authors | ||
3 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
D. Sislak | 1 | 10 | 1.02 |
P. Volf | 2 | 6 | 0.57 |
M. Pechoucek | 3 | 22 | 2.64 |